Here you will find a selection of my academic publications.

Contemporary Scientific Realism: The Challenge from the History of Science

Full details here.

Understanding Inconsistent Science

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013)

Book reviews

“[T]he book is a remarkable achievement both in its breadth and in its depth. Vickers offers by some margin the most comprehensive and detailed discussion of inconsistency in physics of which I am aware … [T]his is an important book.”

Review in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2016), 67(3), pp. 913-918, by Prof. Mathias Frisch. Full review available here.

“Vickers’ treatment of the examples is detailed and well-referenced, while also being admirably accessible, even for an audience that lacks a full grasp of the science and mathematics involved … the book makes a substantial contribution to the literature: gathering these eight examples together in a well-referenced discussion provides an excellent starting point for anyone interested in thinking about inconsistency in science.”

Review in the Journal for General Philosophy of Science (2015), 46(2), pp. 413-418, by Prof. Bryson Brown. Full review available here.

“Vickers’ book is a highly valuable contribution to the literature on inconsistencies in scientific reasoning and to the philosophy of science in general […] it is safe to say that Vickers’ book is from now on a necessary reference for any scholar of these problem fields.”

Review in International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (2016), 28(3), pp. 325-340, by Dunja Seselja and Christian Strasser. Full review available here.

“Peter Vickers’ monograph stands out as a very serious piece of scholarship in historically-and scientifically-informed philosophy of science. It is to be strongly recommended to both philosophers (of science) and reflectively inclined scientists, especially physicists and mathematicians.”

Review in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 9th March 2014, by Prof. Sorin Bangu. Full review available here.

“The method is original and convincing, and thecase studies well researched and compelling […] this is a very creative text, and useful for both those directly interested in the inconsistency debates and also those looking for a novel approach to solving other problems in philosophy of science.”

Review in Metascience 24(1), pp. 49-53, by Associate Prof. Mark Newman. Full review available here.

“The cases themselves are fascinating, and Vickers’ treatment is systematic, detailed, and rigorous. […] Understanding Inconsistent Science [is] a book that I warmly recommend.”

Review in Mind 124(496), pp. 1398-1401, by Prof. Tom Nickles. Full review available here.

Academic articles

(Just a selection)